User Profile

Ben Harris-Roxas

ben_hr@outside.ofa.dog

Joined 2 years, 3 months ago

Researcher and educator from Sydney, Australia. You’ll usually find me on the forgotten parts of the web.

My ratings ★ Not recommended ★★ Not for me, but may be okay for you? ★★★ Good ★★★★ Very good, recommended ★★★★★ Exceptional, couldn't put it down

This link opens in a pop-up window

Ben Harris-Roxas's books

View all books

2025 Reading Goal

Success! Ben Harris-Roxas has read 12 of 12 books.

replied to Dr Ms Kat's status

@pelagikat That's exactly how I felt. It's a rather terrifying and plausible vision of the near-future but damn it's a slog. Some of the narrative perspectives don't seem to add much value other than fulfilling the author's Tolstoy-esque ambitions.

That said, almost a year later I can still vividly recall sections of the book and its imagery. That's certainly not the case with most books I read.

Overall I'm glad I read it, but I will absolutely never read it again. Solidarity with you in your task ✊🏼

Echopraxia (Hardcover, 2014, Tor Books) 3 stars

A follow-up to the Hugo Award-nominated Blindsight, Echopraxia is set in a 22nd-century world transformed …

If you like ideas more than… writing… this may be for you!

2 stars

I continued on to this after reading Blindsight, because even though I didn't love it I had some enduring questions. An error on my part. There were more deliberate ambiguities than plot points in this book.

I won't provide a plot précis. This has some compelling concepts and big ideas, but was frankly a mess. Characters' motivations remain inexplicable even at the end of the book.

Amusingly this AMA with the author seems to boil down to "you're reading it wrong". Authors, please get over yourselves.

Blindsight (Firefall, #1) (2006) 3 stars

Blindsight is a hard science fiction novel by Canadian writer Peter Watts, published by Tor …

Big ideas but strangely hollow

3 stars

The ideas are compelling, and the inclusion of recreated vampires is a weird but interesting diversion. There's no emotional core though. In some ways that's by design - the primary narrative POV is of someone who's had significant, personality-destroying psychosurgery. I found myself asking why should I care about any of this throughout.