Reviews and Comments

Barbarius Locked account

Barbarius@outside.ofa.dog

Joined 2 years, 6 months ago

Mostly reading sci-fi, fantasy, and comics/graphic novels, but occasionally some other stuff too.

This link opens in a pop-up window

Jarrod Carmichael: 101 Board Games To Try Before You Die (Of Boredom) (Paperback, Page Street Publishing Co.) No rating

Move Over, Monopoly!

Find your new favorite board game with this incredible curated guide …

This is great. It's easy to read, and the descriptions of games give a good overview but aren't too long. I'm taking notes and making lists of possible future purchases.

commented on Hulk - Volume 3: Hulk No More by Jeph Loeb (Hulk (2008), #10-13)

Jeph Loeb, Ed McGuinness: Hulk - Volume 3: Hulk No More (Hardcover, Marvel)

I have to be honest, for Jeph Loeb I'm pretty underwhelmed... Three volumes in and it's basically a lot of unconnected stories that are just a lot of punching (even for the Hulk).

For example, in this volume we just had three issues of a giant PvP battle, with a different Hulk, (not the one we've been following) with teammates from other multiverses, who were all resurrected and had their memories wiped afterwards, to then learn absolutely nothing at all...

And this is also after the "filler" second volume... What's going on?

Alex Pavesi: Eight Detectives (Paperback, 2020, Penguin Books, Limited)

All murder mysteries follow a simple set of rules. Grant McAllister, a mystery writer and …

Very good, but I didn't love the ending.

This is a great murder mystery novel. The blurb basically says it all: a retired mathematician defined all the essential parameters of murder mystery novels, described the possible permutations, and then released a collection of seven short stories that demonstrated all the permutations. The story goes through the stories, and describes the permutations along the way.

The book is easy to read, as it's basically a collection of short stories, and it's a great read.

What I don't like about the blurb is that it implies that there's a greater mystery to solve. I don't like this implication, because it's not possible for the reader to solve this greater mystery, because they aren't given all the facts until the revelation at the conclusion. The conclusion is still excellent; it's a lovely part of the story and a good ending, but it's not a mystery you can solve.