Abundance

I borrowed this as an eBook through my local library. That way, I wouldn't have to pay for it, and no one on public transit would see me reading it. I was convinced to read this because of two reasons: 1. If you really want to criticize something, you should read it. Especially so that if someone accuses you of misrepresenting any aspect of it, you can assure them that you did, in fact, read the book. 2. It is short.

The biggest problem of the book is that it doesn't address the core issue beneath all of their lamentations about the decline in American manufacturing and 'progress'. That is: moneyed interest. Instead they claim that while there may be a common thread throughout all the deficits in American gumption they cite as examples, each case is really unique in as much as they cannot be addressed by a lack of spirit or an 'abundance' of red tape. Honestly, there's not much more to say about that. They just miss it, or choose to ignore it.

As for the actual writing and craft of the book: it reads as a precocious teen's essay. Long-winded stories used as examples to emphasize a point, repetition, jumping around. Thankfully it's not written with the intent to challenge, so like reading the transcript to a podcast, you could just zone out and let your eyes do the reading.

Don't make the same mistake I did. Don't bother reading this. Disengage from those who want to talk about this book with you, or if you really can't, watch/read/listen to a critique of this book instead.

I was familiar with most of this argument from reading Ezra Klein's columns and listening to his podcasts (and, to a lesser extent, listening to Thompson's Plain English podcast). I am convinced by the argument: The U.S. political system has put up layers of barriers that prevent inventing, making, and building. From homes to public transportation systems, everything takes too long to build. The barriers were built with good intentions (environmental concerns, racial justice, supporting union labor), but we have reached a point where it is difficult to build what we need. And it is especially bad in cities and states run by Democrats.

I leave the book without a clear sense for how Klein and Thompson would guard against the problems of a "just build it" approach that emerged in previous years (highways built through Black neighborhoods, energy infrastructure built in those same neighborhoods because suburbs take a NIMBY approach to everything from affordable housing to power stations). They would likely say that these trade-offs have to be worked in out politically but that the tradeoff argument can't always land us in a place of not building.

I find it interesting that this book arrived at the exact same time as Jacobin's Spring 2025 issue on "Progress." All parts of the left seem to believe that the time has come for an affirmative vision of the future, given that the right's regressive vision is a hellscape.

The left has not necessarily embraced the argument fully (I think the center-left will be much more amenable). Here's a Jacobin review:

jacobin.com/2025/03/abundance-klein-thompson-book-review

Matt Bruenig lays out the counter-arguments: 1) The historical narrative the book tells is contested; 2) The book sidelines a number of agendas in the name of removing barriers to building/inventing; 3) The authors never face up to the political practicality of their argument - how do they propose to deal with the resistance to an abundance agenda? Resistance from homeowner's associations, unions, environmental activists, and more.

The close of that review seems right to me:

"Ultimately, the book seems fine to me. I’d say the policy specifics are a bit of a retread, but that’s not really a critique: the authors never claim novelty and the book itself is literally a retread of some articles they wrote for the Atlantic and the New York Times. It’s a pop policy book written for a Malcolm Gladwell type of audience, which is a valuable thing for a political movement to have. In short, I think the pique over the book is out of proportion to what the book is.

With that said, the broader Abundist world that the book is attempting to push forward — a world that appears to be teeming with libertarians, right-wing Democrats like Jared Polis and Ritchie Torres, refugees of the effective altruist implosion, and tech sector types — does seem like it could head in some pretty bad directions that Abundance would fit naturally into. But this would not be the fault of Klein and Thompson."