Kolinzkay reviewed Trainspotting by Irvine Welsh
Trainspotting or The Canterbury Tales
5 stars
Irvine Welsh's delightful prose take on Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales as a picaresque novel is one of the unequalled monuments of Scottish Literature. Old English becomes a mixture of Lothian patois and our Sub-Germanic descendant of Middle English, so it was hardly surprising that Scots teens took the novel as their own. Chaucer's various characters have their analogues amongst the rag-tag collection of Lothian heroin addicts (& chums) replacing the Knight, the Wife of Bath, the Cook, the Nun and so on - although since Johhny Lee Miller does star in the movie, I can say there is a Miller's tale (!) It is highly entertaining as Mark Renton bowls along from one love affair with heroin to another, aspiring after the magic rip-off that propels him on to a more successful bourgeoisie existence but - like a modern day Barry Lyndon, - he merely transits from one betrayal to …
Irvine Welsh's delightful prose take on Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales as a picaresque novel is one of the unequalled monuments of Scottish Literature. Old English becomes a mixture of Lothian patois and our Sub-Germanic descendant of Middle English, so it was hardly surprising that Scots teens took the novel as their own. Chaucer's various characters have their analogues amongst the rag-tag collection of Lothian heroin addicts (& chums) replacing the Knight, the Wife of Bath, the Cook, the Nun and so on - although since Johhny Lee Miller does star in the movie, I can say there is a Miller's tale (!) It is highly entertaining as Mark Renton bowls along from one love affair with heroin to another, aspiring after the magic rip-off that propels him on to a more successful bourgeoisie existence but - like a modern day Barry Lyndon, - he merely transits from one betrayal to another regardless of the consquences. It's a great read, probably a greater read if you are a native speaker of Scots. The Times described it as the "voice of Punk," which of course it is not, (It was published in 1993!) - as if The Times would know punk from its elbow. It was however, one of the voices of young people at the time.