Pixel rated The Actual Star: 5 stars

The Actual Star by Monica Byrne (duplicate)
The Actual Star takes readers on a journey over two millennia and six continents —telling three powerful tales a thousand …
I primarily listen to audiobooks using Libby, and sometimes Audible. Feel free to ask me about how I have 11 cards on Libby.
Check out my book lists about things like Asian authors, or Autistic characters!
This link opens in a pop-up window

The Actual Star takes readers on a journey over two millennia and six continents —telling three powerful tales a thousand …

"Sci-Fi's favorite antisocial AI is back on a mission. The case against the too-big-to-fail GrayChris Corporation is floundering, and more …

"Martha Wells's Hugo, Nebula, Alex, and Locus Award-winning, New York Times and USA Today bestselling series, The Murderbot Diaries, comes …
it took me a while to get into it but holy shit this is a wild story, impressively capturing the past present and future from the maya empire to a post-capitalist existence hundreds of years later where beings have seemingly transcended
super fucking cool. never thought of a book as "electric" before, but it is electric. and brutal.
it took me a while to get into it but holy shit this is a wild story, impressively capturing the past present and future from the maya empire to a post-capitalist existence hundreds of years later where beings have seemingly transcended
super fucking cool. never thought of a book as "electric" before, but it is electric. and brutal.
I wasn't prepared to read smut, but it is a lot of smut. And it makes sense, with characters who have extensive fan fiction fandom history, how the smut is written, not just the sex scenes, but the conversations that I wish I saw more in queer mainstream published literature. Namely, conversations about dysphoria, internalized transphobia, how desiring others impacts how we identify or desire our own bodies, the loneliness of queer trans time whether you learn early or later in your life. I didn't read this for the smut, and there was so much to the story outside of the smut.
Too often I see queer trans lit where people are so accepting there is nothing said, and I do like that sometimes, I do wish not to have to struggle for being trans, but my trans experience in reality has been informed by my struggle. Too often …
I wasn't prepared to read smut, but it is a lot of smut. And it makes sense, with characters who have extensive fan fiction fandom history, how the smut is written, not just the sex scenes, but the conversations that I wish I saw more in queer mainstream published literature. Namely, conversations about dysphoria, internalized transphobia, how desiring others impacts how we identify or desire our own bodies, the loneliness of queer trans time whether you learn early or later in your life. I didn't read this for the smut, and there was so much to the story outside of the smut.
Too often I see queer trans lit where people are so accepting there is nothing said, and I do like that sometimes, I do wish not to have to struggle for being trans, but my trans experience in reality has been informed by my struggle. Too often I see queer trans lit where people are so unaccepting that there is also nothing said but pain, but my trans experience is also informed by those who have been kind, curious, willing to be held accountable, and willing to deeply consider what accepting my existence means for how they treat themselves. Whether it's how to refer and interact with genitals, to the ways in which transition can be a constant and/or impromptu thing that one's (potential) partner might consider at any time and how that might effect how desire has been defined up to that point. In a way, it makes sense that these characters and the story have the tone of fan fic, it's often in fan fic that we see fans reimagining what might occur between characters outside of the cannon, what keeps them sustained and intertwined-- or not.
Furthermore, Sol's vampirism is not just about the fantasy of a hot, sexy, shiny vampire that lives forever. Vampirism is rather treated as a debilitating health condition that makes the barriers that he faces in managing his condition along with his relationships or housing strikingly familiar to others with chronic disabilities.
One last note, I do enjoy the mixed media of the book that emphasize a reality not predicated fully on in-person dialogue, including excerpts from bulletin boards and email chains that still do well in the format of audio.
I know this book doesn't have great reviews, but as a fan of the podcast series, I like to be immersed in the world. Sure it's confusing and winding, but that just adds to the inexplicable surreal-ness for me.
I know this book doesn't have great reviews, but as a fan of the podcast series, I like to be immersed in the world. Sure it's confusing and winding, but that just adds to the inexplicable surreal-ness for me.
It was even less relevant to me than the first book without the mushrooms or ecological basis. Spooky things keep happening inexplicably to a person that is brave but did not want to be doing all this can someone please give them a break.
As an amateur mycologist who has been actively involved in community building and engagement around environmental justice and mycology, I must ask, does this book promote mycophobia or mycophillia? I have never read a T. Kingfisher book, but picked this up because I heard it had mushrooms.
I was excited when this book started off featuring a character named Eugenia Potter, implied to the fictional aunt of real mycologist and author of the Peter Rabbit children's books: Beatrix Potter. There are many aspects to real mycological concerns around things like species identification. There's also references to the important discussion of sexism within mycology.
I also do appreciate that the main character Alex (they/them in English, Ka/Kan in native fictional heritage) is one that would not typically get attention as a retired female soldier. When it comes to gender and pronouns, I am torn.
Alex is from a …
As an amateur mycologist who has been actively involved in community building and engagement around environmental justice and mycology, I must ask, does this book promote mycophobia or mycophillia? I have never read a T. Kingfisher book, but picked this up because I heard it had mushrooms.
I was excited when this book started off featuring a character named Eugenia Potter, implied to the fictional aunt of real mycologist and author of the Peter Rabbit children's books: Beatrix Potter. There are many aspects to real mycological concerns around things like species identification. There's also references to the important discussion of sexism within mycology.
I also do appreciate that the main character Alex (they/them in English, Ka/Kan in native fictional heritage) is one that would not typically get attention as a retired female soldier. When it comes to gender and pronouns, I am torn.
Alex is from a fictional country where soldiers gain specific pronouns which translate to a gender neutral term like they/them. In fictional history, soldiers were socially defined as male, but due to an accident a woman was able to become a soldier since there wasn't exactly paperwork with gender exclusive language being equivocated to cis men using he/him, and due to the deficiency in people to conscript, it set a precedent for more women to come. So new rights for women, closer to the rights of men, because of: war.
Pronouns are not the same as gender, period. This carries over as Alex still acknowledges themselves as a woman using occupation-based gender-neutral neopronoun variant of a formerly occupation based cis man's pronoun. I like the idea that the gender associated with pronouns can change. Yet, women are still treated has weaker to men that need to be protected (unless I suppose, they become a soldier).
Alex is often treated in a manner that equivocates soldier status not to a gender neutrality, but to overt manhood through activities and roles that are otherwise mean to exclude non-soldier women (this soldier, that is a "man", cannot be left alone with an unmarried woman), though occasionally dismissed as a woman to be patronized (is this woman really a soldier?), or maybe neither mostly out of a confusion and giving up: not overt acceptance of gender neutral presentation.
Kingfisher's use of gender-neutral pronouns does not appear to me to be an act of defining non-binary gender (as gender is not the same as pronouns), which is fine, but the fact that ultimately binary gender roles are enforced and gender-neutral presentation is still held to it is disappointing. As a transmasc person constantly having my masculinity be put into question or treated as if joining the boy's club means playing into misogynistic gender roles, I don't love Alex being treated as some kind of man-"lite".
Looking into it, there are real historical examples that this seems to be inspired by: known as the Sworn Virgins of Albania. I don't know enough about it though to say what it has to do with pronouns, especially considering Alex is from a fictional country that could have had any history written, Alex is not said to be from Albania!
Ultimately, this is a horror book that, despite Eugenia's love for mushrooms, sets a completely fictional and unfounded fear for mushrooms in our main character. Okay, we have plenty of scary mushroom stories, I'm not going to ban them. My concern is that, to write such a story with an overwhelmingly white, militant, and questionable gender representation, it is not for a person like me nor would I feel comfortable sharing it to promote an interest in mushrooms.
Thank god, it was a very short listen.