I only track books that I read for pleasure, mostly SF/Fantasy. I've fallen out of the habit of actually writing reviews beyond giving a star rating. It would be nice to get back into that habit.
This turned out to be a collection of Eco's humorous columns from a literary magazine from the late 60s and early 70s. I would probably have gotten more out of it if I were more familiar with the works and events that Eco satirizes. Several of them were quite clever.
Covers the history of piracy and contrasts it with how pirates were depicted in fiction. A wealth of interesting material, but the organization was strange. For example: the chapter on the types of ships that pirates tended to use segues into a general discussion of the depiction of pirates in movies by mentioning that they used larger ships because they were more impressive looking and easier to film on. Why aren't those separate chapters?
Review of 'What Should I Do with My Life?' on 'Goodreads'
3 stars
Got this from the library. I was worried that it would be nonstop "I gave up my job as a lawyer to save orphans, and now I'm totally fulfilled!" stories. There were some of those, but not that many. In fact, most of the people in the book don't actually have it figured out. They're grappling with the question, and might see a path that could get them there, but it's not clear that the path they see is the right one, or that they're capable of taking it. As the book goes on, Bronson seems to insert his opinions about what people should do more forcefully, and I found that less and less appealing.
I'm not sure that the central question is the right one. I instinctively resist the idea that I "should" do anything with my life (and Bronson makes it clear that that's not an accidental phrasing). …
Got this from the library. I was worried that it would be nonstop "I gave up my job as a lawyer to save orphans, and now I'm totally fulfilled!" stories. There were some of those, but not that many. In fact, most of the people in the book don't actually have it figured out. They're grappling with the question, and might see a path that could get them there, but it's not clear that the path they see is the right one, or that they're capable of taking it. As the book goes on, Bronson seems to insert his opinions about what people should do more forcefully, and I found that less and less appealing.
I'm not sure that the central question is the right one. I instinctively resist the idea that I "should" do anything with my life (and Bronson makes it clear that that's not an accidental phrasing). After reading it, I don't have a feeling that there's something that I want to be doing differently. Perhaps I'm just obstinate. Or maybe things are just going well right now.
Review of 'Russia and the Golden Horde' on 'Goodreads'
1 star
I grabbed this book from Quincy probably almost a decade ago. It was one of the texts of a Russian history class he was taking. It's been on my shelf since. I'm not sure why it suddenly looked appealing, but I started it. It's very dry. I'm sure the historical detail is fascinating to scholars in the field. Less so to me. Now that I've started something else, I'll probably never finish this.
Looking for Jake is a collection of science fiction, horror and fantasy stories by British …
Review of 'Looking for Jake' on 'Goodreads'
4 stars
A short story collection, mostly Fantasy/Horror. Generally quite good. Some neat ideas, and some good observations. Miéville has a talent for the creepy.
A simple set of dos and don'ts, this book will lead readers where they want …
Review of 'The rules' on 'Goodreads'
1 star
The basic idea is that you play hard to get. This weeds out the potential husbands who aren't devoted enough, and at the same time encourages the ones who run the gauntlet to treat you as something special because you're hard to attain.
Less instructive than I'd hoped. I was hoping to find some ideas about reversing it, so I'd stop attracting the people who are looking to settle down, but it's so extreme that those reversals would only work on people who are following The Rules. Other people wouldn't pick up on the cues.
Also tiresome, repetitive, and obnoxiously dogmatic.
Funny to read just after re-reading The Passion. It's hard to imagine more opposed books, one embracing the idea of being swept away and the futility of trying to hold on, the other preaching the denial of pleasure in the search for blissful matrimony.
In 1965, on a small island in the South Pacific, a group of astronomers gather …
Review of 'The Path of Minor Planets' on 'Goodreads'
3 stars
A convincing account of the lives and loves of a group of astronomers. Captured the feeling of some of the tech-heavy groups I've interacted with. Depressing.
In the astonishing finale to the His Dark Materials trilogy, Lyra and Will are in …
Review of 'The Amber Spyglass' on 'Goodreads'
2 stars
The last of the His Dark Materials series. Pullman starts getting pretty heavy-handed about the religious (or rather the anti-religious) overtones. The over-plot doesn't really resolve convincingly, since it was hard to tell what's so special about the hero and heroine that their actions should have such a large effect. Still a fun read, though.